|
Ethnobotanical
Leaflets 13: 679-88. 2009. Antifungal Profiles of Extracts of Vitellaria paradoxa (Shea-Butter) Bark *R.N. Ahmed, A.
Sani and O. O. Igunnugbemi Department of
Microbiology P.M.B. 1515, * E-mail: anrisikat@unilorin.edu.ng,
+234(0)8063109301 Issued Abstract The antifungal profiles of the bark of Vitellaria paradoxa were
examined against clinical isolates of Aspergillus Key words: Antifungal profiles, Vitellaria
paradoxa, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
(MIC), Minimum
Fungicidal Concentration ( Introduction The use of plants for medicinal purposes
predates the introduction
of antibiotics and other modern drugs (Harkenthal et
al., 1999). The potency of herbal
remedies soon became an issue of dispute due to lack of qualitative identification of their bioactive components (Sofowora, 1986). The search for more potent
chemotherapeutic agents led to the discovery and development of antibiotics (Pelczar et al., 1993). However, as years passed
several microorganisms developed resistance to these antibiotics thereby rendering them
impotent and otherwise useless (Adeleke, 1979; Montefiore et
al., 1983; Olayemi and Oyagade,
1987; Rotimi et al., 1987; Spencer et al., 1986). Overtime, the economy of producing these
antibiotics and subsequent cost of acquiring such orthodox medications was fast getting
out of the reach of the common man. The plant used in this study is Vitellaria paradoxa (synonym:
Butyrospermum parkii), which belong to the family Sapotaceae, and is commonly called Shea butter tree. The plant is a small deciduous tree
found commonly growing in the savanna areas of the African continent (Lowe and Soladoye, 1990).
The clinical isolates used include Aspergillus The aim of this study is to investigate the antifungal
activities of cold and hot aqueous and ethanolic
extracts of the plant bark and evaluate the effect of different
concentrations of the extracts on the test fungi. The Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations (MIC) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations ( Materials
and Methods Plant Collection and Identification Samples of bark of Vitellaria paradoxa were collected from the Permanent Site
Campus of the Preparation of Plant Extracts The fresh plant materials collected were air-dried for a period
of two weeks and they were pre-crushed in a mortar. They were later
pulverized into fine powder using electric blender. Extraction was done with
cold and hot water, and ethanol. Five grams of the powdered sample were
separately suspended each in 25 ml of the extractants.
The cold water and ethanol extraction were done on a rotatory
shaker at 60 rpm for 24 hours while the hot water extraction was carried out
in a water bath at 70 Source and
Maintenance of Test Microorganisms The fungi used in this study
were Aspergillus Antifungal Susceptibility Studies The agar dilution method was used to assay for the antifungal
activity. One milliliter of 200mg/ml concentration
of the extracts was separately incorporated into Malt Extract Agar and
allowed to gel (Oloke et al., 1988). Mycelial plugs of each
test fungus on a 24 hour culture plate were cut with sterile 6.0 mm cork
borer from the advancing margin of the fungal colonies. The plug was placed
at the center of each agar medium containing the
plant extract (Banso, 2005). Agar plates without
the plant extracts were inoculated with mycelial
plugs as controls. All plates were made in duplicates and incubated at room
temperature. The radial growth was measured after seven days for Aspergillus
species and 18 days in the case of the dermatophytes.
The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated using the formula: Percentage
of growth inhibition (A%) = W -X x 100
W Where W = Diameter of radial growth on Malt Extract Agar without
the bark extracts (control plates) and X = Diameter of radial growth on Malt
Extract Agar after exposure to bark extracts. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) The standard solution (200mg/l) of the extract
was diluted to obtain the following concentrations: 200, 150, 100, 85, 80,
75, 70, 65, 60, 55 and 50 mg/ml. One milliliter
each of the concentrations of the extracts was mixed with 9ml of the malt extract broth in test tubes. The contents were thoroughly
mixed and the tubes were inoculated with 0.lml of spore suspension
(standardized to 106 spores/ml) of the test fungi. The tubes were
incubated at 28 ± 20C and examined for growth after 7 days for Aspergillus
species, and 18 days in the case of the dermatophytes.
The least concentration of the bark extracts that did not permit any visible
growth of the inoculated test fungus in the broth medium was regarded as the
MIC in each case. Test tubes inoculated with the test fungi without the bark
extracts served as controls (Black, 1996). Results and
Discussion Antifungal susceptibility profiles of V. paradoxa bark extracts on the test
fungi are shown in Figure 1. The extracts exhibited greater inhibitory
effects against the dermatophytes than the Aspergillus
species and the ethanolic extract exerted the
greatest inhibitory activity against the test fungi while cold aqueous
extract exhibited the least. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and
Minimum Fungicidal Concentration ( The survival profiles of the test fungi against the ethanolic extract are shown in Figure 2. Generally there
was a marked reduction in viability of all the test fungi with increase in
contact time. There was a 100% loss of viability of T. mentagrophytes after an exposure to
the extract for 60 minutes while less than 40% loss was recorded for A. Extracts of the bark of Vitellaria
paradoxa possess antifungal activities
against A. Emeruwa (1982) and El-Faraley et al. (1983)
reported that agents with low antimicrobial
activity against an organism would require high concentrations (MIC and The rate of kill study showed that with
200mg/ml of the ethanolic extract, 106 spores/ml of the Aspergillus
sp. were reduced by over 50% while spores of T. mentagrophytes were
completely killed after 60 minutes contact time. The observed trend revealed
that exposure time would affect the effectiveness of the bark extract as an
antiseptic. These results suggest the possibility that the bark of V. paradoxa could contain high amount of biocidal substances at low concentrations especially
against clinical dermatophytes. Though it is common in Nigerian
ethno-medicine to use the seed of V. paradoxa to treat ringworm infections, this study
has proven that the bark of Shea-butter
plant is also very effective against the dermatophytes. Most times, the traditional preparation of herbal drugs from medicinal
plants often involves cold, hot water or local gin (ogogoro) for the extraction of
different organs of the plants such as bark, leaves and roots. However, this
work has also shown that ethanol is the extractant
of choice because the bioactive
substances in the bark of V. paradoxa tested
are less soluble in cold water than in ethanol. Therefore, using appropriate extractants, the bark of V. paradoxa
could be purified and manufactured as an antiseptic agent for the treatment
of skin infections caused by these
groups of fungi. References Adeleke, D. (1979). Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus
isolates of man and other animals to five antibiotics used in Austuick, P. K. C. (1974). Medically important Aspergillus species. In: Manual of
Clinical Microbiology,
2nd
edition (Edwin, H., Lennette Earle, H.S. and
Truant, J.P. eds.). American Society for
Microbiology, Banso, A. and Ayodele,
O.P. (2001). Activities of extracts of Garcina kola against Escherichia coli and Aspergillus 5: 58-65. Banso, A. (2005). Studies on the antifungal properties of aqueous and
alcoholic extracts of three species of Acalypha. Ph.D. Thesis, Black, J. G.
(1996). Antimicrobial therapy. In: Microbiology, Principles and
Application, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Chong, K. T. and Pagano, P. J. (1997). In-vitro
combination of PNU-140690, a human immunodeficiency type I protease
inhibitor with ritronavir against ritronavir -sensitive
and resistant clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 41(11):
2367-2377. Cowan, M. M. (1999). Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clinical
Microbiology Review.12(4): 564-582. Dalziel, J. M. (1968). The useful plants of West Tropical Africa. Ltd., Apapa, El-Faraley, Y.
S., Cheatham, S. F. and Breelove, R. L. (1983).
Antimicrobial neolignan of Sassafras
randaiense root. Lloydia
46(4): 493-497. Emeruwa, A. L. (1982). Antibacterial substance from Carica
papaya fruit extracts. Journal
of Natural Products. 45(2): 123-127. Harkenthal, M., Reichling,
J., Geiss, H. K. and Sailer,
R. (1999). Comparative study on the in-vitro antibacterial activity of Austrian tea tree oil, cajuput oil, niaouli oil, manuka oil, kamuka and
eucalyptus oil. Pharmazie. 54(6):
460-463. Hugo, W. B. and Ressell,
A. D. (1998).Yeasts and Moulds. In: Pharmaceutical Microbiology.
Blackwell
Science Ltd., Lowe, J. and Soladoye,
M. O. (1990). Some changes and corrections to names of Nigerian plants since publication of Flora of West Tropical Africa edition 2 and Nigerian
Trees. Nigerian Journal of Botany 3: 1-24. Montefiore, D., Adeyemi-Duro, F. A. D. and Rotowa, N. A. (1983). Activity of mczlocillin against in-patient strains of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and Proteus species. West
African Journal of Medicine 2(4): 153-157. Olayemi, A. B. and Oyagade, J. O. (1987). Incidence
of antibiotic resistance among E. Coli isolated from clinical sources and river water. Nigerian Medical Journal 17 (4): 207-209. Oloke, J. K., Kolawole, D. O. and Erhun, W. O. (1988). The antimicrobial and antifungal activities of certain components of Aframonium meleguets fruits. Fitoterapia 59 (5): 384 -388. Pelczar, M. J., Chan, E. S. C. and Krieg, N. R.
(1993). Airborne diseases. In: Microbiology Concepts and Applications. McGraw Hill, Inc. Rotimi, V. O., Mosadoni, H. A. and Sogaolu, O. G. (1987). The inhibitory action of aqueous extracts of
some African chewing sticks on Streptococcus
mitis: Implications in dental caries. West African Journal of
Medicine 6: 61-65. Sofowora, A. (1986). The State of Medicinal Plant Research in Spencer, E.
E. E., Akuma, A. and Uduak,
T. (1986). Surgical wound infection rate in Calabar University
Teaching Hospital. West African Journal
of Medicine 5 (1): 61-68. Thomas, C. G. A. (1993). Medicinal Microbiology ELBS edition. Bailliere Tindall,
208-209. Wolfgang, K. J. and David, T. S. (1972). Zinsser Microbiology. - |
Table 1: The Minimum Inhibitory
Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (
|
Test Organisms |
MIC (mg/ml) |
Control |
|
Control |
|
A. |
80 |
NI |
80 |
NI |
|
A. flavus |
70 |
NI |
75 |
NI |
|
E. floccosum |
65 |
NI |
70 |
NI |
|
M. audouinii |
75 |
NI |
80 |
NI |
|
T. mentagrophytes |
50 |
NI |
55 |
NI |
NI: No
Inhibition

