Ethnobotanical
Leaflets 12: 404-412. 2008.
Ethnobotanical Notes on Tree
Species of Pir Panjal Biodiversity Park of Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah
University, Rajouri, J&K,
Shreekar Pant* and Susheel Verma Centre for Biodiversity Studies, School of Biosciences
and Biotechnology, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri-185 131,
J&K, India *Corresponding author: Phone: 01962-262616 (O); Mobile: +91-94191-73280 E-mail: shreekarpant2@rediffmail.com
Issued 21
June 2008 Abstract The documentation of traditional knowledge would appear to be the "need of the hour" in view of the current demand for herb based products. Documentation serves to ensure the preservation of traditional information for future generations. It is also a step forward in the creation of a database on ethnobotanical notes. An attempt therefore, has been made here to document the indigenous uses of tree species of the Pir Panjal Biodiversity Park of BGSB University. A total of 28 species belonging to 24 genera and 19 families were observed being used traditionally to cure various diseases and having other uses. Out of these, only six species were natives and 22 were non-native of the Indian Himalayan Region. Key
words: Diversity,
Biodiversity Park, Indigenous Knowledge, Rajouri, Introduction Indian Himalayan Region (IHR) has a rich
heritage of species and genetic strains of flora and fauna and considered as
a Mega Hot Spot of biological diversity (Myers, 2000). It comprises about 18% of India and extends
more than 2,800 km in length and 220 to 300 km in width, with an altitudinal
range from 200 - 8000m amsl (Anonymous 1997). Its flora includes about 8,000
species of angiosperms (40% endemic), 44 species of gymnosperms (16%
endemic), 600 species of pteridophytes (25% endemic), 1,737 species of
bryophytes (33% endemic), 1,159 species of lichens (11% endemic) and 6,900
species of fungi (27% endemic) (Singh and Hajra, 1996; Samant et al., 1998a).
It hosts, 1,748 species of medicinal plants (Samant et al., 1998a), 675
species of wild edibles (Samant and Dhar, 1997), 118 species of medicinal
plants yielding essential oils (Samant and Palni, 2001), 279 species of
fodder (Samant, 1998), 155 sacred plants (Samant and Pant, 2003) 138 plants
used in liver disease/ailments (Samant and Pant, 2006). About 121 plants are
listed as rare-endangered (Nayar and Sastry, 1987, 1988, 1990). This rich
biodiversity is being utilized by the inhabitants of the IHR in various forms including medicine, food (wild
edibles), fuel, fodder, timber, for making
agricultural implements, fiber, in religious ceremonies and for various other
purposes (Samant and Dhar, 1997, Samant et al., 1998 b). It is estimated
that 70-80% of the rural population depends on traditional medicine for
primary health-care (Titz, 2004). Due to cultural and ethnic diversity in different biogeographic
provinces of the IHR, the traditional knowledge base of people varies
considerably. Most of the medicinal plants are being extracted for drugs by
pharmaceutical industries from wild. This has adversely affected the very
existence of a number of plants of high commercial value (Farooquee and
Saxena, 1996). Further, with the increasing world demand and renewed global
interest in traditional ethnopharmacy coupled with the increasing preference
for natural substances in the health care system, the natural stock of
medicinal plants of the IHR is under tremendous pressure (Samant et al.,
1998; Kala, 2006; Samant et al., 2007). In India over 2,500 species of ethnobotanical use
are known (Jain, 1991). Further, the rich biological diversity of IHR has
been put to use by the various native communities from ancient times. The
very survival of these resources is now under threat from rapidly expanding
human population and concomitant environmental degradation occurring at a
fast pace. There are major gaps in the knowledge of biological resources and
the means by which biological diversity is maintained (Heywood, 1995). Every
community is making use of bioresources for various ethno pharmaceutical
purposes. The documentation of traditional knowledge therefore becomes very
important for its greater benefit and further extension to other communities.
Keeping in view its relevance, a study was carried out on the diversity and
ethnobotany of tree species of Pir Panjal Biodiversity Park of Baba Ghulam
Shah Badshah University, Rajouri, J&K. Study area The present study has been conducted in the Pir Panjal Biodiversity Park of the Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri. The Pir Panjal Biodiversity Park is spreaded over an area of 437 acres in the Dhanore range of the famous Pir Panjal Himalayan range. The altitude of the Park ranges from 700 – 1200m. The terrain is undulating and rocky with a perennial streamlet passing through the midst, which gets swollen during the rainy season. Climatically, the area faces three main seasons i.e., winter, summer and rainy. Due to typical topography of the area, it supports diverse vegetation ranging from the sub-tropical to temperate types. The inhabitants of the area belong to different cultures and communities, including Gujjars, Bakerwals, Hindus and Muslims, who regularly cater the most of their daily needs from plant resources. Material and Methods The present study is based on the extensive survey conducted in Biodiversity Park of the University between November, 2007-May, 2008. The samples of the tree species were collected and identified with the help of local flora (Sharma and Kachroo, 1981; Singh et al., 2000) and deposited in the University Herbarium. Information on ethnobotany and local names were gathered from natives of the area. Nativity of the species was determined following Anonymous (1883-1970) and Samant et al., (1998a) and endemism was determined by distribution of the species (Dhar and Samant, 1993). Indigenous knowledge associated with the species is based on the primary survey as well as secondary sources (personal observations and Jain, 1991). Results Species Diversity and Utilization Pattern The present study
recorded 28 species belonging to 24 genera and 19 families. These species are
the source of medicine, wild edibles, fuel, fodder, timber, agricultural
tools etc. for the inhabitants (Fig. 1). The utilization pattern of the
species indicated that leaves of 22 species, stems of 12 species, fruit of 11
species, bark of 9 species, root and seed of 4 species, are each used (Fig.
2). The indigenous uses of the species are presented in Table 1. Amongst the families, the Moraceae and Salicaceae
(4 spp., each), Euphorbiaceae, Meliaceae, and Ulmaceae (2 spp., each) were
dominant. Species richness was maximum in the genus Ficus and Salix (3 spp.,
each). In the remaining genera, less than 3 species each were recorded.
Fourteen families were monotypic. Notable among these were the Caesalpiniaceae, Fabaceae, Lythraceae, Mimosaceae,
Myrtaceae, Oleaceae, Pinaceae, Punicaeae,
Rutaceae, Tiliaceae and Urticaceae (Table 1). Nativity and Endemism
Only six species (i.e., Quercus leucotrichophora, Melia
azedarach, Pyrus pashia, Populus
ciliata, Grewia oppositifolia and Ulmus
wallichiana) were native to the IHR. Twenty-two species were introduced
to the Economic Importance Of the total species, 18 species were used as fodder, 16 as medicine, 12 as fuel, 3 as timber and few for other purposes (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Discussion The
present study provides comprehensive information on the diversity and
indigenous uses of the tree species present in the In the present century, the
conservation and sustainable utilization of bioresources are two topics that
are generating a lot of attention throughout the world. Therefore, the
documentation of information on diversity and indigenous practices should
help in the preservation of that knowledge. Information from other parts of
the IHR should also be documented; so that a comprehensive database of the
plants used for various purposes could be saved for posterity. Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to
Hon’ble Vice Chancellor, References Anonymous. 1883-1970. Index Kewensis Plantarum Phanerogamarum
Vol.1-2 (1883-1885) and 15 Suppl. (1886-1970). Anonymous. 1997. Conservation Assessment and
Management Plan Workshop Process. WWF, Dhar, U. & S.S. Samant. 1993. Endemic diversity of Indian Himalaya. I. Ranunculaceae and II. Paeoniaceae. Journal of Biogeography, 20: 659-668. Farooquee, N.A. & K.G. Saxena. 1996. Conservation and
utilization of medicinal plants in high hills of Heywood, V.H. 1995. Global Biodiversity Assessment.
Jain S.K.
1991. Dictionary of Indian Folk
Medicine and Ethnobotany. Deep Publications, Kala, C.P. 2006. Medicinal Plants: potential for economic development on
the State of Myers, N., Muttermeier R. A, Muttermeier, C. A, da Fonseca, A.B. G & Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858 Nayar,
M. P. & A. R. K. Sastry, 1987, 1988 & 1990. Red Data Book
of Indian Plants, Vol. I- Rai, L.K., Prasad Pankaj & E. Sharma. Conservation threats to some important plants of the Sikkim Himalaya. Biological Conservation, 93: (2000) 27-33. Samant, S.S. & U. Dhar 1997. Diversity, endemism and economic potential of wild edible plants of Indian Himalaya. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 4: 179-191. Samant,
S.S. 1998. Diversity, distribution and conservation of fodder resource of
west Samant S.S., U. Dhar & L.M.S., Palni. 1998a.
Medicinal Plants of Indian Samant, S.S., U. Dhar & R.S. Rawal.
1998b. Biodiversity status of a protected area of West Himalaya-1. Askot
Wildlife Sanctuary. International
Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 5: 193-203. Samant, S.S. & L.M.S. Palni, 2001. Diversity, distribution and indigenous uses of essential oil yielding plants of Indian Himalayan Region. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science, 22: 671-687. Samant, S. S. & S. Pant. 2003. Diversity, distribution pattern and traditional knowledge of Sacred Plants in Indian Himalayan Region. Indian Journal of Forestry, 26 (3):201-213. Samant, S. S. & Shreekar Pant. 2006. Diversity, distribution pattern and conservation status of plants used in liver diseases/ailments in Indian Himalayan Region. Journal of Mountain Science, 3(1): 28-47. Samant, S.S., Shreekar Pant, Man Singh, Manohar Lal, Ashok Singh, Aman
Sharma & Sakshi Bhandari. 2007. Medicinal Plants in Himachal Pradesh,
north western Sharma, B.M. & P. Kachroo. 1981. Flora of Singh
D.K. & P.K. Hajra. 1996. Floristic diversity. In: Changing
Perspectives of Biodiversity Status
in the Singh, N.P., D.K. Singh & B.P. Uniyal. 2000. Flora
of Jammu and Kashmir-Vol-I, Botanical survey of Titz. A. 2004. Medicinal Herbs and plants-scope for diversified and
sustainable extraction. Paper presented in Workshop on Medicinal Plants
“Trade in medicinal Plants”, 22-26 July, |
Table 1. Diversity and indigenous knowledge of tree species of Pir Panjal Biodiversity Park of BGSB University, Rajouri, J&K, India.
|
Family/Taxa |
Local Name |
LF |
Nativity |
Parts Used |
Indigenous
Uses |
|
Caesalpiniaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauhinia variegata |
Kachnar |
T |
India Or Burma, China |
Bk, Fl Rt, Lf |
Medicinal (Diarrhoea,
dysentery, fatness, Indigestion, laxative,
leprosy, malaria, piles (bleed), scrofula, skin disease, snake bite,
syphilis, tumors, ulcers, worms); Edible |
|
Euphorbiaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emblica officinalis Gaertn. |
Amla |
T |
As Trop |
Fr, Sd, Bk, Lf |
Medicinal (Asthma,
bronchitis, burns, cold, Constipation, cooling,
diabetes, diuretic, dysentery, eye complaints, fever, headache, laxative,
liver complaints, madness, purgative, revive taste, scorpion bite, stomache complaints,
thirst, vaginal complaints, wounds, veterinary stomach disease); Edible |
|
Mallotus philippensis (L.) Muell.-Arg. |
Kamela |
T |
As et Austr Trop |
|
Medicinal |
|
Fabaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robinia pseudo-acacia L. |
Kikar |
T |
Amer Bor |
Lf, St |
Fuel, Fodder |
|
Fagaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quercus leuco-trichophora A. Camus |
Banj |
T |
Reg Himal |
St, Lf |
Fodder; Fuel; Timber |
|
Lythraceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodfordia fruticosa (L.) Kurz |
Dataki |
T |
As et Afr Trop |
St, Fl, Rt, Infl |
Medicinal (Bleed in
pregnancy, bone fracture, burns, cancer, carbuncle, cholera, cooling, cough,
disrrhoea, dropsy, dysentery, fever, haemorrhage, injuries, loss of appetite
in pregnancy, mennorhoea, muscle pain, nausea, night blindness, fever,
rheumatism, skin disease, small pox, sores, spleen complaints, sprain, tonic,
ulcer wounds, veterinary sores); Edible |
|
Meliaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melia azedarach L. |
Dhrenk |
T |
Reg Himal |
Fr, Lf, Bk, Sh |
Medicinal (Anthelmintic, antiseptic,
blood purification, hair fall, headache, insecticidal, promote conception,
rheumatism, gout, skin disease, vermifuge, wounds); Edible |
|
Toona ciliata L. |
Tun |
T |
Austral |
Bk, Fr, Lf |
Medicinal (Antiseptic, dysentery,
bronchitis, fever, gastric trouble); Fodder |
|
Mimosaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth. |
Sareen |
T |
Geront Trop |
Lf, St |
Fuel; Fodder; Timber |
|
Moraceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ficus carica L. |
Anjeer |
T |
|
Fr, Lf |
Edible; Fodder |
|
F. Palmata
Frossk. |
Fagawara |
T |
Afr Trop Arab Ind Or |
Fr, Lf, La |
Medicinal (Dysentery,
indigestion, laxative); Edible; Fodder |
|
F. racemosa
L. |
Trimbal |
T |
Reg Himal Burma |
Lf, Fr |
Edible; Fodder; Fuel |
|
Morus alba L. |
Toot |
T |
As Temp |
Fr, Lf |
Edible; Fodder |
|
Myrtacea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels |
Jamum |
T |
As et Austr Trop |
Bk, Lf, St, Sd |
Medicinal (Anemia,
astringent, blisters in mouth, cancer, colic, diabetes, diarrhea, digestion complaints,
dysentery, piles, pimples, stomachache, tonic); Edible |
|
Oleaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olea ferruginea Royle |
Kohu |
T |
Europe Austral |
Lf, St |
Fodder; Fuel |
|
Pinaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinus roxburghii Sargent** |
Chir |
T |
Asia Minor Afghan |
Sd, St |
Medicinal (Boils, bone
fracture, cracks in sole of feet, leprosy, other skin diseases, snake bite,
sprain, swelling, ulcers, urine complaints); Edible; Fuel; Timber;
Agricultural tools |
|
Punicaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Punica granatum L. |
Darooni |
T |
Europe Austr Maurit |
Rt, St, Fr, Lf |
Medicinal (Anthelminitic,
stop bleeding, child birth, miscarriage, cholera, cooling, cough, diarrhea,
dysentery, eye complaints, pimples, stomachache); Edible |
|
Rosaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pyrus pashia Buch.-Ham.
Ed D. Don |
Kainth |
T |
Reg Himal |
Lf, Fr |
Medicinal (Eye complaints);
Edible; Fuel; Fodder |
|
Rutaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zanthoxylum armatum DC. |
Timbru |
T |
Reg Himal China |
Fr |
Medicinal; Edible |
|
Salicaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Populus ciliate Wall. Ex Royle |
- |
T |
Reg Himal |
Bk, Wd |
Medicinal (Bone fracture);
Fodder |
|
S. alba L. |
Bais |
T |
Ind Or Malaya |
Lf, St |
Fuel; Fodder |
|
S. babylonica L. |
Bais |
T |
Reg Caucas As Bor |
Lf, St |
Fuel; Fodder |
|
S. tetrasperma D. Don |
Bais |
T |
Ind Or Malaya |
Lf, St |
Fuel; Fodder |
|
Sapindaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sapindus mukorossi L. |
Rantha |
T |
As Trop |
Lf, Sd |
Medicinal; used for other
purposes |
|
Tiliaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grewia oppositifolia Buch.-Ham. Ex Roxb.** |
Tapan |
T |
Reg Himal |
Lf, St, Bk |
Medicinal (Eruption, fever,
veterinary, bone fracture as splinter); Fodder; Fiber; Fuel |
|
Ulmaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celtis australis L. |
Kharik |
T |
Europe As Temp Ind Or |
Lf, Rt, Bk |
Fodder; Fuel |
|
Ulmus wallichiana Planch. ** |
Manu |
T |
Reg Himal |
Bk |
Medicinal (Bone fracture,
bone dislocation) |
|
Urticaceae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debregeasia salicifolia (Gaud.) Rendle |
- |
T |
As et Afr Trop |
Fr, Lf |
Fodder; Edible |
Abbreviations used: LF=Life form; T=Tree; ** =Near Endemic; Bk=Bark; Fl=Flower; Fr=Fruit;
Infl=Inflorescence;
La=Latex; Lf=Leaf; Re=Religious; Rt=Root; Sd=Seed;
St=Stem; Wd=Wood
Fig. 1. Utilization
pattern of the tree species in

Fig. 2. Use
pattern of the tree species in

Abbreviations used: Lf=leaves; St=Stem; Fr=Fruit; Bk=Bark; Rt=Root; Sd=Seed;
Fl=Flower; Infl= inflorescence; La=Latex; Wd=Wood; and Wp=Whole Plant