Ethnobotanical Leaflets 14: 807-
Plant
Species in the Folk medicine of Kit
Mikayi region, Western Kenya
Arwa S. Phanuel , Nyunja R.O.
and Onyango J.C.
Department
of Botany and Horticulture,
P.O,
Issued:
July 1, 2010
Abstract
An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in
Kit Mikayi area of
Key words: Ethnobotanical,
Informant consensus factors, Use values, Western Kenya.
Introduction
Plants have been an integral part of life in many
indigenous communities, and
Furthermore some regions have remained conserved and
preserved for historical and cultural purposes in some areas such as
This paper is a report of an
ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in Kit Mikayi area of
Materials and
Methods
Field work was conducted
from April to November 2007.The information was gathered from ethnobotanical
interviews that were limited to herbalists living in remote regions, often with
no more than two or three houses, where small families of peasants live. Their economic way of life does not rely
entirely on agriculture. Small landholdings, comprising the majority of the
land adjacent to the settlements, are used for subsistence farming, and all our
informants resided there. Preliminary investigations suggested that people
living in larger villages and working in the secondary or tertiary sector did
not retain knowledge about the local flora and its uses. Fifty-six participants
were initially selected; most of them were women (60% female and 40% male),
aged between 50 and 85 years (average age 65). Open informal interviews were
used to collected information. Sixty four people were chosen from the selected
participants on the basis of their ability to identify species in the field and
to retain traditional knowledge of plant uses. Only the plants indicated by at
least two informants were taken into account.
Generally, plants were
collected with the informants, who were asked to indicate their vernacular
names, the part(s) of the plant and its/their uses, and the preparation
procedure. Plant samples were identified in the field, except for dubious
cases, which were brought back to the laboratory and identified. Voucher
specimens of wild plants reported by informants in the study area were prepared
and deposited in Maseno University Botanic Garden Herbarium.
The informant consensus
factors of the different species were determined according to Moerman (2007)
as:
.
Where nur is the number of mentions in each usage set (or indication),
and ni is the number of taxa represented in each usage set.
IAR=ICF
Results and Discussion
Ethnobotanical investigation in Kit Mikayi has
revealed that 37 species, out of a total of about 400 medicinal species in
However a comparison of the
plants used in this region with those reported for neighbouring areas revealed
that there were many uses that were valued in these plants but were not valued
in other locations (20 of the 27 medicinal plants listed were involved), and
that frequently, there were changes in the way the plants were administered.
However, many of the peculiar medicinal uses documented in this area were
quoted by Kokwaro (1993). Moreover, for some of these species namely Thunbergia alata , Crinum macowanii ,similar uses have been quoted in other countries,
mainly in the
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge BIOTA E-2
Project for funding,
References:
Akama, J. S. 1999 Marginalization
of the Maasai in
(3):716-718.
Fratkin, E. M. 1996. Traditional medicine and concepts of healing among Samburu pastoralists
of
Fratkin, E. M., Mearns, R. 2003. Sustainability and Pastoral Livelihoods: Lessons from East
Africa and
Kokwaro, J. O. 1976. Medicinal
Plants of East Africa,
Kokwaro, J. O. 1993. Medicinal
Plants of East Africa,
Moerman, D. 2007. Agreement and meaning: Rethinking consensus analysis. Journal of
Ethnopharmacology 112 451–460
Sidigia,
WHO 1999. Development of national policy on traditional medicine .Workshop on the
Development of National Policy on Traditional
Medicine,
October 1999. (http//www.wpro.who.int)