|
Ethnobotanical
Leaflets 13: 273-79. 2009. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Medicobotanical Studies in Relation to Veterinary
Medicine in Ekiti State, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
J.
Kayode, M. K. Olanipekun
and P. O. Tedela |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Department of Plant
Science, University of Ado-Ekiti, E-mail: josmodkay@yahoo.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Issued |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ABSTRACT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A
semi-structured questionnaire matrix and direct field observation were used
to identify botanical used for veterinary health care in the rural areas of |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
INTRODUCTION |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The study being here reported is a
part of on-going studies on the medicobotanicals used
in veterinary medicine being conducted at the Department of Plant Science,
University of Ado-Ekiti, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MATERIALS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ekiti
state was divided into three zones, Ekiti North, Ekiti Central and Ekiti South,
based on the existing political delineation. In each zone, ten communities
that were still relatively far from urban influence were chosen. In each of
these communities, ten respondents who had maintained domicile for a period
of not less than 20 years were chosen and interviewed with the aid of
semi-structured questionnaire matrix (after Kayode
2002, 2005, Kayode and Omotoyinbo
2008). The interviews were conducted with a fairly open framework that
allowed for focused, conversational, two-way communication. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Botanical species used for
veterinary treatments, in each community, were identified and documented.
Information on the part(s) of such plant used was documented. Voucher
specimens of the species were collected and later scientifically identified
at the herbarium of the Department of Plant Science, University of Ado-Ekiti, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Secondary information was obtained
from records at the |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RESULTS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Field observation revealed that
poultry constituted the bulk of livestock kept in the study area where
livestock was recognized as occupying a prominent place in the rural economy.
The birds were mostly managed using the free range system. There were no
traditional veterinary healers in any of the communities sampled in this
study. Elsewhere in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most
of the residents in the study area were quite familiar with the appearance of
some symptoms which they used in recognizing the various diseases affecting
their poultry livestock (Table 1) and many considered pests as being an
integral part of the diseases that hindered poultry productivity in the study
area. Some of the poultry diseases were known to be caused by nutritional
deficiencies while some were recognized as being caused by
micro-organisms. A total of 38 plants
belonging to 27 families (Table 2) were valued for the treatments of poultry
pests and diseases (Tables 1 and 3), the part mostly utilized was the leaves
(Table 2). Elsewhere in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
indigenous knowledge on the efficacies of these botanical species is passed
from one generation to another. Respondents were of the opinion that the
various governments in the country had demonstrated inadequate concerns for
livestock health thus confirming the assertion of Sarr
and Abdul (1999) that apart from the successful control of rinderpest, little or no efforts had been demonstrated by
the government on the control of veterinary diseases. Field observation also
revealed that respondents were aware of the successful control of bird flu
that was also carried out by the Federal Government of Nigeria in the year
2004-2006. However, the financial commitments by governments, as previously
observed by Abdu et al. (2000) were poor when compared to the number and diverse
breeds and species of livestock in the country. This has further fueled the
dependence of the rural and the urban resource-poor farmers on the use of
botanicals for the livestock. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In
conclusion, residents in the rural areas were confronted with multiple
problems that hindered poultry productivity. These include the lack of
functional veterinary hospital, inadequate financial resources, non-availability
of modern veterinary drugs, even when diverse sources were utilized to source
for fund to purchase them, poor extension services and increased
environmental degradation that has deleterious effects on the health of the
livestock. With the increasing rates at which indigenous knowledge are being
lost, the documentation of the ehtnobotanicals
cannot be over-emphasized. According
to Raul et al. (1990), considerable
wealth of knowledge is inherent in most cultures of the world. Thus the use
of etnoverterinary medicine is widely considered as
sustainable (Gueye 1995) as it is perceived as
economical, culturally acceptable and economically sound. Consequent on the
above, the previous suggestion of Chiezey et al. (2000) that empirical trails
must be carried out to ascertain their efficacies, safety and relative health
and economic risks before they are widely promoted, is still relevant. The
abundance of the botanicals, in the study area, must be determined with the
aim of establishing sustainable strategies that would conserve the rare
species among them. Standard dosages must be established for the species as
this might be necessary in integrating the botanicals with modern orthodox
veterinary medicine. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
assistance of ANTHRA, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
REFERENCES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Abdu, P. A., Jagun, A. G., Gefu, J. O. Mohammed, A. K., Alawa,
C. B. I. and Omokanye, A.T. (2000). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A
survey of ethnoveterinary practices of agropastorialist in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
al.(Eds.). Ethnovertirinary
practices, Research and Development, National
Animal Production |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Institute, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chiezey, N. P., Gefu, J.
O., Jagun, A. G., Abdu, P. A., Alawa, C. B. I., Magaji, S. O., Adeyinka, J.
A. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
and Eduvie, L. O. (2000).
Evaluation of some Nigerian plants for anthelmintic
activity in young |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
cattle. Pp. 38-48. In Gafu, J,
O, et al. (Eds.). Ethnoveterinary practices, Research and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Development, National
Animal Production Research Institute, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guaeye, E. F. (1995). Ethnoveterinary
medicine against poultry diseases in African villages. World’s |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poultry Science Journal 9.55(2), 187-198. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kayode, J. and
Faluyi, M. A. (1994). Studies on self and
cross-compatibility in soybean (Glycine
max |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
L.) in
a tropical rainforest environment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kayode, J. (1999). Phytosociological
investigation of compositae weeds in abandoned
farmlands in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kayode, J. (2002).
Conservation and ethnobotanical exploration of compositae in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compositae Newsletter 37,
79 – 83. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kayode, J. (2004). Conservation
Perception of Endangered Tree Species by Rural Dwellers of Ekiti |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kayode, J. and Omotoyinbo, M. A. (2008).
Conservation of Botanicals Used for Dental and Oral |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Healthcare in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keengwe, M. and Benalo, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
animal health care
practices. Intermediate Technology Development Group and International |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Institute of Rural Reconstruction,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kudi, A. C. and Myint, S. H.
(1999). Antiviral activity of some Nigerian medicinal plant extracts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Journal
of Ethnopharmacacology 68, 289-294. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nwude, N. (1977). Nigerian plants that may cause
poisoning in livestock. Vet. Bull. 47(11),
811-817. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ramana, M. V. (2008). Ethnomedicinal and Ethnoveterinary Plants from Boath,
Adilabad district, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Andhra Pradesh, India. Ethnobotanical Leaflets 12: 391-400. 2008. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Raul, P., Pedrazo, M.
and Manuela, P. (1990). Animal health
care in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
-23. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sanyasi Rao, M. C.,
Varma, Y. N. R. and Vijaykumar, R. (2008). Ethno
veterinary medical plants of |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the catchment area
of the River Papogni in the Chittor
and Ananthapur districts of Andra |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sarr, J. and Abdu, P. A.
(1999). Study of the needs in veterinary vaccines in ECOWAS member |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
states. Study Report, The Department of Industry,
Agriculture and Natural Resources, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ECOWAS Secretariat, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 1. Respondents’ indigenous technical knowledge on
poultry pests and diseases. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 2. List of identified botanicals used for the
treatment of poultry diseases in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 3. Folk medicinal value of the identified botanical
species used for the treatment of poultry diseases in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|