Antibacterial Potential of Clerodendrum
inerme Crude Extracts Against Some Human
Pathogenic Bacteria
Abdul
Viqar Khan and Athar Ali
Khan
Department
of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences,
This communication emphasized upon the sensitivity of the crude extracts of Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn. [Verbenaceae] against some of the human pathogenic bacteria. Five plant extracts (Petrol, Benzene, Methanol, Ethly acetate and Aqueous) under six different concentrations(500mg/ml, 1mg/ml, 2mg/ml, 5mg/ml,10mg/ml and 15mg/ml) were tested by disk diffusion method . Methanol, Ethyl acetate and Aqueous extracts of the plant showed significant inhibition against fifteen of the eighteen bacteria tested. No earlier report on antibacterial activity of this taxon could be found in literature.
Key words : Clerodendrum inerme, sensitivity, inhibition.
Plants have been an integral
part of human society since the start of civilization. India is rich in its plants
diversity, a number of plants have been documented for their medicinal
potential which are in use by the traditional healers, herbals folklorists and
in Indian systems of medicine namely, Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha apart from a
Homeopathy and Electropathy. These plant species play
major role in the health care of the nations
population.
Different national and international pharmaceutical companies are utilizing such plant based formulations in treatment of various diseases and disorders world around (Chandel et al., 1997; Singh & Gautam, 1997; Satyavati et al.,1987; Pulliah, 2002; Jain, 1991; Khan et al.,2002 ; Kirtikar & Basu , 1935)
Many of the plant species have been documented pharmacologically and clinically which are endowed in phytochemicals with marked activity on human pathogenic bacteria. (Anonymous, 1976; Ray & Majumdar , 1976 ; Khan, 2002; Cox, 1994; Khan et al., 2002; Asolkar et al.,1992; Rastigi & Mehrotra, 1991,1993; Rastogi, 1998 ; Perry & Metzer, 1998 ; Fransworth , 1988).
An attempt was made to study the possible anti bacterial potential of the plant Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn. [Verbenaceae]. It is a straggling shrub, leaves obovate to elliptical oblong, and glabrous. Plant is commonly grown as hedged. Locally the plant is known as Lanjai , its leaves are used in chronic pyrexia (Khan , 2002).
Chemical constituents: 3- epicaryoptin, neolignan.
Pharmacology: Alcoholic extract of the plant proved to be hypotensive. While essential oil possess anti fungal properties( Asolkar et al.,1992; Rastigi & Mehrotra, 1991,1993; Rastogi, 1998).
Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn. [Verbenaceae], leaves of the plant were collected from the
university campus,
Crude plant extracts; were prepared following Robinson (1963), the protocol is described below:
i. Freshly dried and healthy plant material is ground into fine powder in an electric grinder. Powder so obtained is stored in dessicator.
ii. Five hundred g plant powder is refluxed with 95% methyl alcohol (MeOH) in a round bottom flask on a water bath for 10 hours. Mother liquor (Crude MeOH extract) is filtered out and residual plant material is again refluxed with 95% methyl alcohol for 10 hours. The process is repeated four times to obtain maximum yield of MeOH extract. The extract is evaporated to dryness at 50°C under reduced pressure.
iii. Dried methanol extract is refluxed with light petrol (60-80°C) for five hours. After filtration, the residual methanol extract is again refluxed with petrol for five hours and filtered. This process is repeated five times. Petrol is evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain petrol soluble extract.
iv. Petrol insoluble fraction of methanol extract obtained in step (iii) is refluxed with benzene for five hours. Thereafter, it was filtered and refluxed again with benzene for five hours and filtered. The process was repeated five times. Benzene is evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain benzene soluble extract.
v. Benzene insoluble fraction obtained in step (iv) is refluxed with ethyl acetate for five hours. Thereafter, it is filtered and refluxed again with ethyl acetate for five hours and filtered. The process is repeated five times. Ethyl acetate is evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain ethyl acetate soluble extract.
vi. Ethyl acetate insoluble fraction obtained in step (v) is refluxed with methyl alcohol (95%) for five hours, filtered and is repeatedly refluxed for five times with methyl alcohol (Methanol). The methanolic soluble fraction is evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain methanolic extract, while methanol insoluble residue is discarded. The steps are graphically presented as a flow chart in Fig. 3B
Preparation
of aqueous extract
Shade dried plant material (500 g) is ground to a fine powder, It is poured with distilled water, and left for 72 hours at room temperature. The flask is then refluxed over hot water bath for 10 hours and the mother liquor is filtered. The solute is again added with solvent (distilled water) that is again refluxed and filtered; this process is repeated for 4 times. The filtrate, thus obtained, is evaporated to complete dryness on a water bath. The residue thus obtained is aqueous plant extract.
The (Mueller& Hinton, 1941) agar plates were inoculated with inoculums of 106 size, a sterile swab is dipped into diluted culture inoculums, the agar surface of the plates is streaked in three directions turning the plates by 600 by each streak .The paper disk(what man filter paper no 1) with 500mg/ml, 1mg/ml, 2mg/ml, 5mg/ml,10mg/ml and 15mg/ml plant extracts were dried and placed at the agar surface with the help of a sterile forceps. Finally press the sensitivity disc with forceps to make complete contact with the surface of the medium. Allow the plates to stand at room temperature for 30 minutes. (Pre diffusion time). Inoculated petridishes were incubated at 370C over night and the inhibition zone were recorded.(Bauer et al., 1966, Cruickshank, 1968 ; Colle & Marr, 1989). The experiments were repeated thrice and the mean of the triplicate of the results is summarized in table no. 1.
Antibacterial activity by disc diffusion method (Bauer et al., 1966, Cruickshank, 1968). Diameters of petri dish and disc 9.0 cm and 0.5 cm respectively.
Results
The petrol extract of the plant was found to be effective
against four of the gram positive and seven of the gram negative pathogenic
bacteria. Benzene extract of the plant inhibited the growth of five gram
positive and six gram negative
bacteria. Ethyl acetate and Methanol fraction of the plant was found to be
effective against all the tested gram positive bacteria while they were found
inactive against three of the gram negative bacteria.(Pseudomonas aeruginos, Salmonella typhi, Shigella dysenteriae ).The crude leaf extract (Aqueous extract)
of the plant was effective against fifteen of the tested pathogens.(Table no.
1)
Table – 1
Antibacterial
activity of Clerodendrum inerme (Whole plant)a
crude extracts
Inhibition
zone (mm)
|
Gram Positive Bacteria |
Gram Negative Bacteria |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
PETROL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
mg |
06 |
02 |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
00 |
00 |
04 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
05 |
06 |
- |
|
1
mg |
06 |
05 |
- |
04 |
04 |
- |
- |
- |
03 |
04 |
04 |
05 |
05 |
- |
- |
06 |
06 |
- |
|
2
mg |
11 |
08 |
- |
09 |
08 |
- |
- |
- |
08 |
09 |
09 |
08 |
08 |
- |
- |
09 |
09 |
- |
|
5
mg |
14 |
11 |
- |
12 |
11 |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
11 |
- |
- |
12 |
13 |
- |
|
10
mg |
18 |
16 |
- |
17 |
16 |
- |
- |
- |
17 |
17 |
17 |
16 |
16 |
- |
- |
18 |
17 |
- |
|
15
mg |
22 |
19 |
- |
20 |
19 |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
20 |
21 |
19 |
19 |
- |
- |
20 |
19 |
- |
BENZENE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
mg |
03 |
- |
06 |
- |
04 |
00 |
04 |
00 |
00 |
04 |
04 |
- |
- |
- |
00 |
- |
- |
05 |
|
1
mg |
03 |
- |
07 |
- |
05 |
04 |
05 |
05 |
02 |
05 |
06 |
- |
- |
- |
03 |
- |
- |
06 |
|
2
mg |
06 |
- |
10 |
- |
08 |
07 |
09 |
08 |
06 |
09 |
09 |
- |
- |
- |
07 |
- |
- |
09 |
|
5
mg |
12 |
- |
14 |
- |
11 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
09 |
13 |
12 |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
- |
- |
11 |
|
10
mg |
16 |
- |
17 |
- |
16 |
12 |
16 |
16 |
12 |
16 |
16 |
- |
- |
- |
16 |
- |
- |
16 |
|
15
mg |
19 |
- |
20 |
- |
19 |
16 |
21 |
19 |
16 |
19 |
19 |
- |
- |
- |
19 |
- |
- |
19 |
ETHYLACETATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
mg |
04 |
04 |
04 |
05 |
01 |
03 |
04 |
- |
04 |
04 |
- |
04 |
- |
01 |
03 |
02 |
02 |
03 |
|
1
mg |
04 |
05 |
05 |
05 |
02 |
04 |
05 |
- |
04 |
05 |
- |
04 |
- |
02 |
05 |
03 |
03 |
04 |
|
2
mg |
08 |
08 |
07 |
08 |
04 |
06 |
09 |
- |
08 |
07 |
- |
06 |
- |
04 |
09 |
06 |
06 |
07 |
|
5
mg |
14 |
14 |
12 |
14 |
07 |
10 |
15 |
- |
10 |
10 |
- |
09 |
- |
06 |
14 |
09 |
09 |
10 |
|
10
mg |
17 |
16 |
17 |
19 |
09 |
12 |
19 |
- |
13 |
13 |
- |
14 |
- |
09 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
|
15
mg |
21 |
20 |
21 |
21 |
12 |
18 |
21 |
- |
17 |
18 |
- |
19 |
- |
11 |
21 |
13 |
15 |
17 |
METHANOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
mg 1
mg 2
mg 5
mg 10
mg 15
mg |
03 04 08 14 17 21 |
04 05 09 15 17 21 |
04 04 08 12 17 20 |
- 02 06 09 13 19 |
- - 04 07 09 12 |
02 03 06 10 12 16 |
04 05 08 14 17 20 |
05 05 08 14 17 20 |
- - - - - - |
- 02 06 09 12 16 |
03 04 08 11 13 18 |
- - - - - - |
03 04 06 09 12 16 |
- - - - - - |
- - 04 06 09 11 |
02 02 05 09 11 15 |
02 05 06 09 11 14 |
04 05 07 12 14 16 |
AQUEOUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
mg 1
mg 2
mg 5
mg 10
mg 15
mg |
- - 05 10 13 16 |
- 03 06 11 13 17 |
- 02 05 10 13 15 |
02 03 06 10 14 16 |
- - - 03 05 08 |
- - 05 07 10 12 |
- - 03 08 11 15 |
- - - - - - |
- - 02 05 08 10 |
01 02 05 0810 13 |
- - - - - - |
01 02 05 07 09 11 |
- - - - - - |
- - - - - - |
- - 04 06 08 11 |
- - - - - - |
- - 05 07 10 12 |
- - - - - - |
Chloramphenicol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
mg/disc |
18 |
18 |
16 |
- |
- |
- |
16 |
18 |
16 |
- |
16 |
18 |
- |
16 |
17 |
19 |
18 |
20 |
1.Staphylococcus aureus 2. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25953 3.
Staphylococcus albus 4. Streptococcus haemolyticus Group-A 5.
Streptococcus haemolyticus Group-B
6. Streptococcus faecalis 7.
Bacillus subtilis.
1.Escherichia coli 2. Edwardsiella tarda 3. Klebsiella pneumoniae
4. Proteus mirabilis 5. Proteus
vulgaris 6. Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7. Salmonella typhi 8. Shigella boydii 9. Shigella dysenteriae
10. Shigella flexneri 11. Plesiomonas shigelloides.
aValues are the mean of replication of three; -, no inhibition.
Discussion
Very interesting facts were recorded during the sensitivity
test performed .In case of petrol extract Staphylococcus aureus
was the most affected bacteria (zone of inhibition 6mm/500mg/ml/disk).
Followed by Shigella dysenteriae and
higella flexneri (zone
of inhibition 5mm/500mg/ml/disk). Benzene extract inhibited the growth
of eleven tested bacteria and the maximum inhibition zone was recorded against Staphylococcus
albus(zone of inhibition 6mm/500mg/ml/disk).Fifteen microorganisms were found
sensitive to ethyl acetate fraction and the most affected bacteria were Staphylococcus
aureus, Klebsiella
pneumoniae and Shigella
boydii(zone of inhibition 8mm/500mg/ml/disk/each).While methanolic
fraction was found to most effective against Streptococcus faecalis and Bacillus subtilis gram
positive and three of the gram negative bacteria(Klebsiella
pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Shigella
boydii) (zone of inhibition 7mm/500mg/ml/disk/each).
From
the results it is clear that leaves of Clerodendrum
inerme are effective in controlling bacterial
pathogens, particularly gram positive bacteria. In these investigations it
becomes certain that most effective crude extract was ethyl acetate for which
maximum zone of inhibition was recorded. Followed by methanol
fraction that also inhibited the growth of fifteen tested human pathogens.
While petrol and benzene extracts as compared to the methanol showed weak anti
microbial action. This action may be synergistic and not due to the efficacy of
one single substance. It was also noticed that methanol, ethyl acetate and
aqueous extracts showed antibacterial activity against both types of pathogens
(Fig. 1). The above results revealed that plant extracts could be effective
antibiotics. Both in controlling gram positive and
gram-negative human pathogens. The results also confirm the utility of
plant as a wound-healing agent.
Acknowledgement
Thanks are due to Department of Science and Technology SERC Division,
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Anonymous (1976) Indian material medica, Vol.1, pp.283-284, Population Prakashan,
2. Asolker
3. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM & Sherries T. (1996)
Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standard single disc method. American
Journal of clinical pathology 45,493
4. Colle JA & Marr W. (1989) Cultivation of
Bacteria. In Mackie & Mc Cartney: Practical
microbiology 13thed. pp.121-140,
Churchill livingston,
5. Cox PA. (1994) The ethnobotanical approach to drug discovery: strengths and
limitations. In, ethnobotany and the search for
the new drugs. pp. 25-36, John Wiley & Sons.
6. Cruickshank R. (1968) Medical Microbiology
: A guide to diagnosis and
control of infection, pp.888,
7. Fransworth NR. (1988) Sereening
plants for new medicines .
8. Jain SK. (1991) Dictionary of Indian Folk medicine
and ethnobotany, pp.XII+311, Deep
publication, N.Delhi.
9. Khan A.V. & Khan A.A. (2003) herbal abortifacients
used by folk people of some districts of Western Uttar Pradesh (
10. Khan AV, Parveen G,. Alam MM & Singh VK. (2002) Ethnomedicinal
uses of Neem in rural areas of
11. Khan AV, Alam MM & Singh VK.
(2002). Ethnomedicinal uses of Citrullus colocynthis
(L.) Schard. In rural areas of Aligarh
District of Uttar Pradesh, India Ethnomed.
& Pharmacog. II. Rec. Prog
in Med. Plants. 7, 383-388, (Sci.
Tech. Pub.
12. Khan AV. (2002) Ethnobotanical
studies on plants with medicinal and anti-bacterial properties pp. 1-293.
(Thesis).
13. Kirtikar KR & Basu BD.
(1935) Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol 3,
pp. 1841.
14. Mueller JH &
Hinton J. (1941) A protein free medium for primary isolation of the
gonococcus and meningococcus proceedings of society
of exp. Biology and Medicine 48, 330-333.
15. Perry LM & Metzer J.
(1998) Medicinal plants of east and south
16. Rastogi RP & Mehrotra BN.
(1991) Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants, Vol. III 1: 497, CSIR
Publication,
17. Rastogi RP & Mehrotra BN.
(1993) Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants, Vol. IV 1: 497 CSIR
Publication,
18. Rastogi RP .(1998) Compendium of
Indian Medicinal Plants, Vol. 1, 497, CSIR Publication,
19. Ray PG & Majumdar SK.
(1976) Antimicrobial activity of some Indian Plants. Economic Botany 30(4),
317-329.
20. Satyavati. GV, Gupta AK & Tanabu N.
(1987) Medicinal plants of
21. Singh SH & Gautam M.
(1993) Bioresources of Med. & Aro.
Plants of